<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>UsabilityBlog - Latest Comments in Voting and Usability Double-Shot</title><link>http://usabilityblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Blogging about usability and the user experience</description><atom:link href="https://usabilityblog.disqus.com/voting_and_usability_double_shot/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:50:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Voting and Usability Double-Shot</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2008/07/voting-and-usability-double-shot/#comment-4785108</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Lawmakers have the authority to determine instructional guidelines for ballots. When these are determined at the local and state level, how do we consistently lobby for change? I would love to see federal guidelines based on Design for Democracy and EAC best practices: &lt;a href="http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/design-for-democracy-eac-reports" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/design-for-democracy-eac-reports"&gt;http://www.aiga.org/content...&lt;/a&gt;. Although just getting started in the fight for ballot usability, I am overwhelmed by the concern that ballots are not standard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Samantha LeVan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>