<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>UsabilityBlog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-1c3aef14" type="application/json"/><link>http://usabilityblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Blogging about usability and the user experience</description><atom:link href="http://usabilityblog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:09:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google+ Add To Circles Interaction: Some Good &amp;#038; Not-So-Good UX</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2012/01/google-add-to-circles-interaction-some-good-not-so-good-ux/#comment-414901297</link><description>Based on the video, you lost your selected items when you clicked to dismiss the More Actions menu.  And then you didn't notice the yellow tag at the top of the page that said what had happened and gave an Undo to restore the selection.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Did you use the Send Feedback button to enquire about a non-D&amp;amp;D way of circling people?  Of course, if you have to move to the More Actions menu and select a circle from there (as you tried to do), then you're no better than by dragging to a circle and maybe worse.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Drew</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:09:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve Found It: The Worst Thermostat Ever</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2012/01/ive-found-it-the-worth-thermostat-ever/#comment-402858415</link><description>Thanks for the feedback on the design btw. I'm prob going to switch themes back; I don't like it much either.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pjsherman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:17:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve Found It: The Worst Thermostat Ever</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2012/01/ive-found-it-the-worth-thermostat-ever/#comment-402776039</link><description>I would guess that the Cool/Off/Heat switch affects what the buttons changes do, making some changes unaffective in some states.  Had a car temp UI in a Ford Focus this last week which had Auto and manual temp up at the same time, never did figure out how to make them work right.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, not a good redesign for the blog.  When I come to the front page, the huge graphic (which isn't really related to the blog content) fills most of the screen, such that the entire first headline is "below the fold" (only the posting date is above).  I have to scroll the page to see if there is new content to read; shouldn't need to do that.  Lots of extra white space up there.  (I'm on Chrome on a Mac laptop, if that matters.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Drew</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:19:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;ve Found It: The Worst Thermostat Ever</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2012/01/ive-found-it-the-worth-thermostat-ever/#comment-402213297</link><description>I think it’s not worst; it changes automatically temperature time to time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Duplication</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Yale&amp;#8217;s Art Department Site: Worst Site Ever?</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/11/yales-art-department-site-worst-site-ever/#comment-400987471</link><description>I am using this as an example in web design as the worst ever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trish Flynn94</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:40:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Requirements And Design Lose The Sale</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/12/when-requirements-and-design-lose-the-sale/#comment-397916003</link><description>Good to hear from you, Andreas! Yes, I could've made a larger donation, but I didn't want to spend that money all at once. I just wanted to "set and forget" a recurring donation spread across the next 11 months. But the site was not designed to support that feature.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pjsherman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 10:40:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When Requirements And Design Lose The Sale</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/12/when-requirements-and-design-lose-the-sale/#comment-397873645</link><description>interesting post paul!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;why would you want to make a recurring donation? you could also make a single donation which is larger, couldn't you?&lt;br&gt;what is your motivation behind it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andreasbossard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 08:52:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: User Experience Design: A Mini-Festo</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/12/we-are-uxd-a-mini-festo/#comment-394373965</link><description>This Mini Festo is interesting which is providing new designs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joomla Design</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:41:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: User Experience Design: A Mini-Festo</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/12/we-are-uxd-a-mini-festo/#comment-393623460</link><description>This user Experience Design is good for everyone. It is showing new relevant results.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laptop Repair</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 07:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cryptic/Amusing Error Message</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/06/crypticamusing-error-message/#comment-391355353</link><description>Because they probably forgot about it.&lt;br&gt;Been there, done that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sebastian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: User Experience Design: A Mini-Festo</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/12/we-are-uxd-a-mini-festo/#comment-389986275</link><description>So relevant as 2012 is forecasted to be the year of the user and simplicity. The only thing I might offer in addition to the UX offering piece is the term "story." Perhaps it differs based on the variety of industries we inhabit but I find it meaningful to refer to UX as "story telling" since the foundation of the design process is communication. Process categories can be thought of as chapters and workflows as story lines that guide the user. I find it to be a very handy analogy to guide group decisions... especially when involving those outside of UX (ie - marketing). Nice post!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amber Eklund-Wilks</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:43:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Please Enter A Valid Email Address&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2009/03/please-enter-a-valid-email-address/#comment-387265777</link><description>read</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MD:SAFIN HAYDER (SHUVO)</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 10:45:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Disable The Paypal Help Center</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/how-to-disable-the-paypal-help-center/#comment-380215876</link><description>same problem in Spain and Poland....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kastanedowski ebay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:50:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eBay: Hah Hah, Made You Think!</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/09/ebay-hah-hah-made-you-think/#comment-372634533</link><description>hmm good one. This is something that one need not to think about if you are giving a go to text you should have a link there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sushil bharwani</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 02:50:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Please Enter A Valid Email Address&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2009/03/please-enter-a-valid-email-address/#comment-372258138</link><description>We can thank Yahoo for aiding and abetting spammers with the feature of "disposable email accounts"&lt;br&gt;To add the email address to the spam portion of mail options is useless because once the address is added the spammer has already deleted that email address from their account.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TheresNoEscapingSpam</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:18:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mashableahhh</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/07/mashableahhh/#comment-370278308</link><description>I agree, it screams for attention this way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Funny that the image shows an article on Google+, which bathes in white space and peace, so to speak.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Raymond Van Velzen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:41:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Disable The Paypal Help Center</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2010/02/how-to-disable-the-paypal-help-center/#comment-335286910</link><description>Same problem for italian users. And I just can't believe reading "2010" on your article! PayPal loves to keep bugs?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:11:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Dubious Claim</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/09/a-dubious-claim/#comment-321060007</link><description>Yeah.  I always prefer cash myself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaopubs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:00:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Message Can&amp;#8217;t Be Blank? Why The Hell Not?</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/09/message-cant-be-blank-why-the-hell-not/#comment-320489020</link><description>Yeah, what he said.  ("You have been unsubscribed...")</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mntgmry</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Message Can&amp;#8217;t Be Blank? Why The Hell Not?</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/09/message-cant-be-blank-why-the-hell-not/#comment-319723672</link><description>They don't require you to explain why. When you reach that page you have already been unsubscribed, see message on the first line. If you want to submit additional info to explain why then indeed you cannot submit a blank message.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I can see why there is some confusion here...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">itamarl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:35:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Message Can&amp;#8217;t Be Blank? Why The Hell Not?</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/09/message-cant-be-blank-why-the-hell-not/#comment-319719681</link><description>These days if I can't unsubscribe from a list I didn't explicitly choose to join with only 2 clicks then I will usually hit the report as spam button. I get fed up of having to unsubscribe from a mareting list every time I use a new website. This would class as one of those cases.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachel Reveley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:28:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whatever You Do&amp;#8230;Don&amp;#8217;t Search For &amp;#8220;ASCII Mr. Burns&amp;#8221; Or Google Will Flip Out</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/09/whatever-you-do-dont-search-for-ascii-mr-burns-or-google-will-flip-out/#comment-312377780</link><description>It has little to do with that actually query ("ASCII Mr. Burns"). Basically, Google has an automated system that tries to detect automated scanning/attacks/etc. For instance, Google has a useful calculator feature (you can type in "(2 mm)*sin(30 degrees) in cm" and it will tell you the answer (with proper unit conversion). But if you do many searches like this in a row, it will throw up errors like that. Reason being that the kind of search is strange (searching for strange mixtures of characters is one way to find vulnerabilities in websites), and obviously searching in rapid succession is similar to what an automated script would do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Point being, it's nothing to be too alarmed over. Probably your research search history was inordinately rapid or otherwise atypical.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:14:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whatever You Do&amp;#8230;Don&amp;#8217;t Search For &amp;#8220;ASCII Mr. Burns&amp;#8221; Or Google Will Flip Out</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/09/whatever-you-do-dont-search-for-ascii-mr-burns-or-google-will-flip-out/#comment-310021909</link><description>I just tried the same and it worked fine? I apologize if I'm missing something.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Peno</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:31:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: RushLimbaugh.com&amp;#8230;Wait For It&amp;#8230;Not Enough White Space</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/09/rushlimbaugh-com-wait-for-it-not-enough-white-space/#comment-307712674</link><description>That page just overwhelms you. In definate need of white space if you ask me. Too much going on!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amir farid</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:41:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Classy Fridge Infographic</title><link>http://www.usabilityblog.com/2011/08/classy-fridge-infographic/#comment-294359066</link><description>This image is hilariously misleading thanks to the two sets of "finger" representations. The professional looking cuffs do add a dapper touch though!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hillary O'Keefe</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:01:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
