DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! UsabilityBlog is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

UsabilityBlog

Blogging about usability and the user experience
Jump to original thread »
Author

Interruptions: Nuisance or Valuable Data Source? (A UBlog Rerun…)

Started by pjsherman · 6 months ago

(Originally posted April 2005 - P.S.)
There is one constant across almost all office-based work environments: the office worker is subject to innumerable interruptions and distractions. Yet when we test software and web sites for usability, we always seek to minimize interruptions and dist ... Continue reading »

2 comments

  • Lyle

    4 years ago

    I think having fewer distractions during testing can be a Good Thing. Granted, it may falsely set the application up to succeed or to do better than it might in the real world. But even given that kind of benefit, most applications will have many problems uncovered during testing.

    In your hypothetical example, you have to question whether the reason the app earned undeservedly high marks was due to a lack of interruptions or due to some other issues with the usability testing methods applied. For example: Were the tasks too simple and not representative of real world tasks? Were the evaluators truly representative of the user base? Did the facilitator ask any leading questions? etc...

    Of course, your theory about distractions might be right for the hypothetical situation...and you could use other UCD methods to validate or reinforce that theory. For example, you might use a little ethnographic field study with tech support and managers and observe them using this application and others to determine if distractions were the cause of user errors that didn't turn up when there were no distractions.

    P.S. Glad to see you blogging!
    reply
  • Vance

    1 year ago

    Why are you rerunning old articles? I look forward to your posts, but keep seeing these old ones come up.
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login